Showing posts with label Eddie Brock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eddie Brock. Show all posts

Wednesday, 1 April 2020

Praise4Media #63 - Venom

How do you make a Venom story without Spider-man? Easy, there are hundreds of venom comics you can adapt for that? How do you make a Venom origin story without spider-man? Now that’s a trickier question.


When the Amazing Spider-man 2 was filmed, it was intended as a springboard for spin-off properties, in theory not a bad idea but it was handled so clumsily it brought down the reception of the whole film. The Amazing Spider-man 2 made decent money, but not enough for Sony executives to be satisfied, so they reached a deal with Marvel to bring a new version of the web-head into the MCU.

But the idea of spin-offs wasn’t dropped entirely, they were just distanced from any spider-man legacy. So, we are back to our original question: How do you do a venom origin without spider-man?

Grappling with the answer to this question is Jeff Pinker, who co-wrote the Amazing Spider-man 2, Dark Tower and the modern Jumanji movies, Scott Rosenberg, who did an uncredited revision of the first Raimi Spider-man movie, and also the modern Jumanji films (also Kangaroo Jack), and Kelly Marcel, who co-wrote saving Mr Banks and unfortunately did the screenplay for the original 50 Shades of Grey movie. I will never dignify those movies with reviews, so never ask. So mixed bag there then. Directing the film is Ruben Fleischer of the Zombieland films. Wikipedia says he’s directing Uncharted but with the way that project’s going through directors I’m sure if it hasn’t already, it will have changed in the 2 months between me writing this review and it being published.

The film had a budget of $116m and surpassed expectations, making $856m, more than half of the live action Spider-man films made, though less than the more recent MCU outings. It certainly created a divide between audiences and critics, with critics giving it a 29% Rotten Tomatoes rating with an average 4.42/10 score and audiences giving it an 80% rating with an average 4.02/5 score. So, where do I stand? let’s take a look…

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

Spider-man Month - TV Retrospective: The Spectacular Spider-man

It's still Spider-man Month


Watching those 3 movies made me want to make a deal with Mephisto. They were all god-awful. And no-one is going to change my mind on that. I’ll get onto the Amazing (the title, I’m not saying they’re amazing) movies next week, suffice to say I find them a lot more enjoyable, even if they are flawed.

But that’s next week. This week we look at Greg Weisman and Victor Cook’s attempt to bring life into the wall-crawler. Bear in mind, for the purposes of the review, I have not been able to watch all the episodes. I’m doing most of this off memory, so there may be a few inaccuracies. Obviously spoilers will be discussed.

Sunday, 15 March 2015

Spider-man Month - Mini review: Spider-man 3


Oh boy, Spider-man 3, considered by most fans to be the worst of the trilogy. Great… In case you haven’t been reading my previous reviews, here’s what I think of the first 2: THEY BOTH SUCKED!

Hammy dialogue, an unlikeable protagonist with an even less likeable love interest, a shallow aunt and a range of iconic if still 1-dimensional supporting characters. Hell, Harry Osborn is thus far the most interesting character of the 2 movies and he’s being set up to become the THIRD SCHITZOPHRENIC VILLAIN OF THE SERIES! Seriously, if you cut out most of the filler, the FIRST TWO MOVIES ARE BASICALLY THE SAME PLOT! Science creates a villain, Peter Parker struggles with his powers, his social life sucks, he flirts with Mary Jane and she gets kidnapped a lot and the villain kills himself and has a change of heart at the last minute. So, with that in mind, I’ve come prepared for Spider-man 3 with plenty of alcohol… I have a feeling I will need it