Showing posts with label Poseidon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poseidon. Show all posts

Sunday, 15 March 2020

Redux Month: Percy Jackson & the (Olympians: The) Lightning Thief



I took a look at the Percy Jackson movies side by side as a sequel baiting, concluding that whilst neither of them were good, Sea of Monsters marginally edged out The Lightning Thief as a better product. Now time to look at each of them as individual entities.


I have now read the first two Percy Jackson novels and… they were OK. It was a reasonably engaging tale and I like the idea of Greek Gods operating in the modern world but I felt like Percy got to see all the horror and calamity with none of the fun and joy. And this may have been intentional, true to Greek myth and whatnot, but was jarring to me as a reader. It kinda reminded me of the Spiderwick Chronicles (the film anyway, and not in context, but in tone). The Lightning Thief was the worst for this, as we continually saw that Percy was being blamed for disasters caused by the monster fights, being essentially branded a terrorist.

The writer for this first outing and yes, there’s only one, is Craig Titley. He did the not particularly good live action Scooby Doo movie, a couple of decent episodes of Star Wars: The Clone Wars and a few from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. So, you could argue this as a net positive, not seen Cheaper by the Dozen so can’t use that to judge but it’s never a great sign when you only have one writer, and no-one to reign him in.

Chris Columbus is in the director’s chair, just off of the first two Harry Potter movies, so at least he’s a guy with experience in this. The film made money but not to the same level as Harry Potter did and got a more decidedly mixed reception. Why? Let’s take a closer look.

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

Sequel Baiting #3: Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief vs Sea of Monsters


Percy Jackson has had a tough go in movies, a failed attempt at a 5-movie franchise adapting the popular novels by Rick Riordan. And when I say 'adapting' I mean in the loosest possible fashion. The first movie changes some major elements from the first book. With the second, I wonder if the writers had only flicked through the book before throwing it away and working on their script. But this is not a review that will rank these movies as adaptations, I myself have only read Wikipedia summaries of the plot. Both movies had a similar mixed reception, and made a similar amount of money about $220m, but the second one had a higher budget so it was seen as disappointing. I have seen both of these movies and here are my thoughts.