So,
Fantastic 4 may have sucked but it made money so the inevitable sequel came
out, and it sucks.
Released in
2007, this film managed only 37% on Rotten tomatoes and made $280m on it’s
$130m budget, which is still more than the current movie is likely to make.
So I ask
what makes a good comic book adaptation? Comic books characters have decades of
history behind them making it quite difficult to come up with an idea that
embraces the feel and spirit of the characters whilst also being unique in its
own way. The biggest difference between a comic book adaptation and a book adaptation
is the fact the story is (to an extent at least) completely original, it just
stars the characters from the comic book.
Capturing
the tone and feel of the characters is a struggle because the tone and feel of
characters have changed over time through retcons and alternate universes. This
is why I really didn’t mind the fact they went for the ultimate universe
origins for the Fantastic 4 in their latest release, it makes sense to not
re-tread old ground and release the same origin, like they did with Spider-man.
(Spider-man’s origins in the mainstream and ultimate universe are pretty
similar)
I don’t have
a full answer for me take the cliff-notes versions of what the characters are
like in the comics and craft a good story. The good story with well-paced and
balanced action is key to a good superhero movie. Create a good dynamic between
the characters and the rest will follow.
So, what
goes wrong here? Let’s dive into Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer to find
out.