Men in Black
II came out in 2002 and was met with a decent Box Office performance but a poor
critical reception, which likely factored into the 3rd movie not
coming out until 10 years later. Why was the critical reception so poor, well
here’s my take on it.
Men in Black
II takes place 5 years after the first movie, J is a more seasoned agent but is
having trouble maintaining a partner, which means that his concerns about the neuraliser
giving you cancer have been brushed aside. Also means that the women I can’t
remember the name of from the morgue last movie, yeah, she’s been neuralized
and won’t be spoken of again.
Speaking of
interesting bits of the last movie that are undone, K’s fiancĂ© from that movie
is gone, she left him. Good to see they respect the ending of the last movie
so… Anyway, so when an alien named Sarleena (Lara Flynn Boyle) comes to earth
seeking the Light of Zartha, an object related to K’s past, J must find K and
bring him back up to speed so he can solve the mystery. And what does it have
to a character played by Rosario Dawson that J is smitten for.
OK, so the
good things, we maintain the great banter between J and K, it still is
reasonably funny, it maintains the same great ideas the first one had, the
acting is still good for the most part. It’s nice to J be a little less dumb
and more assertive, and I think that balances quite nicely with K’s character,
especially when he didn’t have his memories so it became a kinda role-reversal.
But Men in
Black II is widely considered the worst movie in the Men in Black franchise and
I can see why. There is nothing really new to this movie. The weapons are
basically the same as in the last, there are few if any stand out aliens, some
of the twists are basically rehashes of the ones in the first movie and it
starts to bring things backwards by having K return and J basically start
making stupid mistakes.
Then there’s
the story and it’s not very good, let’s talk about the city of New York,
there’s an opening set-piece involving a giant worm going through subway
stations. They completely gloss over how they managed to neuralise everyone who
saw it, bear in mind, most of the time in the first movie, the incidents were reasonably
local so I could buy that they got to everyone. Here, it’s unlikely, really
unlikely
I’m also not
fond of Rosario Dawson’s character being a love interest, because it feels like
too much of a retread of the first movie, sure, she has a more important role
later on she spends most of the movie as J’s love interest. *sigh*
We also have
an overabundance of comic relief characters. The illegal trader, he’s back, the
dog has a substantial role, the main villain has a comic relief sidekick… I get
the need for levity but the movie already aims for comedy so I don’t see the
point of them here. And then we have the stupid neuraliser in the statue of
Liberty. NO MOVIE, NO!
OK, let’s
talk about some plot. After K gets his memory back (a little early in my
opinion) he finds he’s neuralised the information that’s actually important.
Wait, how does that work, he was deneuralised, that’s what the machine was
supposed to do. Anyway, so he conveniently left himself a series of clues
including a locker key in a locker in a pizza joint that in no way could’ve
been moved over the god-knows how many years that pizza place was running.
Locker in
airport home to a native race because of course it is and watch is controlling
the Statue of Liberty. I don’t like these scavenger hunt narratives, they go
out of their way to make it overly complicated and it mostly just wastes time.
Men in Black
II is a dumb movie, but it still maintains a certain charm, making it
impossible for me to completely hate
Rating
50/100
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave a comment, whether you agree or disagree with my opinions, and you're perfectly welcome to. Please be considerate