A nerdy guy
with Rage Issues, among the last of the human race
He was just
a media nerd, he ranted a lot, it was quite absurd
But he was
special for some reason, so bad men decided it was Rage Issues season
He’ll star
in 3 movies, 4 if we squeeze him dry
He’ll go and
join a rebel force, as he’ll slowly lose his mind
Now keep in
mind, he’s just a guy, no different from you or me
So, he’ll
have to learn how to survive, with the help of YA Movies
Franchise Roll call:
The Hunger Games
The Maze Runner
Diiiiiiiivergent
If you’re
wondering how he posts his thoughts, and who he’s posting for
Repeat to
yourself, it’s just a theme, and stop thinking any more
It’s Young
Adult Month!
Because I’ve
made a conscious choice to read the books from this point on, I’ve decided to
change the order. The Maze Runner was a series of 3 books (I’m excluding the
prequel books since they weren’t adapted) written by James Dashner and released
between 2009 and 2011, and it’s Fox throwing their hand into the YA ring with
the adaption of this franchise.
And it’s off
to a mixed start, but with a silver lining of making over $300m on a $35m
budget. Critically though, it holds a 65% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, which just
barely qualifies as fresh, with an average score of a meagre 5.9/10, it holds a
similar audience rating of 68%, though with a higher 3.7/5 average. These would
be the highest scores this franchise gets so let’s take a look.
This film,
as well as the book thrives on what you don’t know to start off with, and has a
lot of twists and turns, so full spoilers for the plot synopsis.
Thomas
(Dylan O’Brien) finds himself in a glade full of strangers, with barely a
memory of who he is, it’s soon explained that he’s in the middle of a maze, a
maze that in 3 years, no-one has managed to find the way out of, so they’ve
settled down and formed a small community known as the Glade, each with their own jobs.
Thomas’
reckless selflessness ends up with him trapped in the maze at night, where
cyborg monsters known as Grievers attack. He manages to survive and even kill
one of the Grievers but this begins to change everything. The maze opens up,
making the Glade vulnerable to attack at night, and a new person, the only girl,
Teresa (Kaya Scodelario) arrives as the proclaimed last initiate, and seems to
inexplicably recognise Thomas. Can the group manage to escape the maze? And
what awaits them when they do?
This movie
has a similar plot structure to the book its based on, but changes a lot of the
little details that make the book an engaging read. Some of these are necessary
in the adaptation to film. For example we don’t see Thomas doing various jobs
around the Glade to see which one he was most suited for, also the escape code
is more simple and that accounts for another element that was cut out of the
book.
In terms of
things that were cut either because the studios didn’t think the audience could
take them seriously or because of budget, there are 2 that spring to mind. The
first being the telepathic connection Thomas and Theresa have and the other
being the existence of a rudimentary teleporter called a Flat Trans. I’m fine
with these being cut out, although it’ll make adapting the next 2 books more
difficult as their inclusion there is more central to the plot.
I think the
movie did as a good a job as they could capturing the overall aesthetic of the
book. The maze looks suitably impressive, the Grievers look similar enough to
how they’re described in the book, and the characters look pretty much on-point
with their descriptions. The CGI is decent for a film with this budget, and the
use of makeup for the griever stings is also pretty effective.
It’s very
difficult to analyse the plot of this movie without immediately comparing it to
the book now I've read it, the book has its distinct advantages over a movie as you can get into
the characters head, and the length isn’t restricted so the passage of time is
better. I’ve said before that a movie should stand or fall on its own merits
first and as an adaptation second but here most of its major issues come from
elements poorly implemented as an adaptation.
There are a
couple of characters completely screwed over in the adaptation process, but the
main one I want to talk about is Gally (Will Poulter). His hatred for Thomas
seems largely unjustified here and his ‘take over of the glade’ is a plot
cul-de-sac that goes nowhere and wasn’t in the book. The fact that the serum to
help against Griever stings is only available with Theresa means they can’t
have him having been stung by a Griever like he was in the book, which means he
can’t vaguely remember Thomas from having been stung, fuelling his initial
hatred of him.
The hatred
grows, in the book, when Theresa shows up and something akin to the ‘the final phase’ is
mentioned, it’s only after her arrival that Thomas enters the maze to save
Minho (Ki Hong Lee) and Alby (Aml Amreen) and survives the night, and whilst
Minho is suggesting Thomas become the head runner, he’s suggesting punishment
for rule breaking well beyond what the others would accept. He disappears not
long after this.
He returns
when the Grievers attack, telling everyone that they’d claim one victim per
night (which is all merged to one attack) his next appearance is in the final
room where he kills Chuck (Blake Cooper – who got just about enough screen-time in the film that this death makes me feel sad) but in the book, it’s clear he’s under mind
control whilst doing it, which is not the case in the movie, this combined with
him being stabbed by Minho rather than beaten to death by Thomas not only
devalues a strong Thomas moment, but is also gonna make things confusing 2
movies later.
The other
person who got shafted is Theresa. In this movie she does basically nothing and
although I’d hardly call her a major player in this book either, she does
provide a couple of important plot moments for later one, including a mantra
that is instead done when Thomas stings himself
Ava Paige –
The head of the not very subtly named WICKED, rebranded WCKD in the film
Gets a bit
more screen-time than she did in the book, a consequence of them hiring Patricia
Clarkson to play her. The problem is it amounts to her giving a speech
explaining some backstory, which is fine, but all the while her men are being
taken out behind and she shoots herself, only to appear alive again in the end. It all ends up being a bit silly. She was never that sort of villain in the book and by the end you wonder whether she was
really a villain at all.
The acting
is pretty good throughout, which was enough to carry this film in spite of the
odd problem. Dylan O’Brien’s Thomas has the unfortunate job of being the
audience insert character and is quite bland because of this. Props to Thomas
Brodie-Samster playing Newt as he’s the only other actor of note I’ve not
mentioned yet.
The Maze
Runners offers a faithful overview of the book’s story but it doesn’t handle
the details very well, devaluing the actions of certain characters, or
expanding them beyond their need in the story (I’m talking Gally, not so much
Ava.) I understand the need to condense the plot and, in some cases, (like the
code) I think it actually improves the story but the overall package is just
OK.
Rating
55/100
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave a comment, whether you agree or disagree with my opinions, and you're perfectly welcome to. Please be considerate