Being the
first movie to follow up an Avengers movie is a big deal, Iron Man 3 rode the
Avengers Wave and grossed over $1bn, despite not being as big a critical hit as
a lot of previous movies. Ant-man wasn’t as big a hit, but it was another Marvel
gamble. With $142m in its budget, it managed to gross $512m, whilst on the lower
end of Marvel movies, it was enough to be considered a success and green-light a
sequel. Critically, it’s well liked with an 81% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
So why am I
not exactly excited on this one… well, let’s take a look.
OK, let’s
start with an important point. Hank Pym is not Ant-man in this story. Here’s
the thing about Hank Pym, in the comics his psyche is a can of worms, he’s been
abusive, he’s been mentally destroyed and turned into a villain. Having a
character like that as the star would’ve been a mistake in my opinion, the Pym
portrayed by Michael Douglas is fine, and his backstory makes a good deal of
sense.
I think the
movie does a good job visually, they handle the shrinking and enlargement well
and have some creative ideas from a tank bursting through a building, to a
model Thomas the Tank engine and a giant ant. This lead to some very visually
impressive action scenes. It’s not the action that bothers me.
But there
are things that bother me a lot, let’s start with the supporting cast, all of
Scott’s associates annoy me and I don’t find them funny at all. They’re
incompetence isn’t charming, their near misses aren’t funny, the chatterbox
lingo annoys me. Moving on.
Also, the
whole trust issue dynamic between Hope and Scott, even though it was resolved
reasonably quickly, it still felt like it went on too long.
Then we have
Darren Cross and oh dear, what did we say about motivations last time? He’s
annoyed at Pym because he was once a mentee and SHOW, DON’T TELL! If you’re
going to make an audience care about this angle, you can’t just tell us the two
used to have this dynamic, you need to prove it, and make us care about it.
It's especially annoying because this motivation isn’t entirely compatible with ‘I want to create the weapon and sell it to HYDRA’ – that suggests the motivation is money, not to prove something. That’s not to say both can’t be true at once but never did Cross really suggest money was a part of his motive.
It's especially annoying because this motivation isn’t entirely compatible with ‘I want to create the weapon and sell it to HYDRA’ – that suggests the motivation is money, not to prove something. That’s not to say both can’t be true at once but never did Cross really suggest money was a part of his motive.
OK, so the
heist itself, it’s setup nicely has good bits of tension going on, has a bit of
a Mission Impossible feel to it, which is certainly different for a super-hero
movie and for once the climax has a personal touch, although that’s hampered by
the fact the motivation of Cross to attack Lang is very petty. (Also there's an ant called Ant-thony who dies HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA)
I like kid
they got to play Cassie, and actually I think having her step-father be less of
a jackass than he is in the comics is a good play. Also the scene with Falcon
felt very much forced just to have another Avenger in the movie.
Ant-man is
lower on the scale of Marvel movies for me than it is from some others, its
humour isn’t as good and the history with Edgar Wright’s involvement only goes
to sour me against the project even more. Still, now the origin is out of the
way, maybe they improve with the sequel.
Rating
65/100
2 more movies to go in Marvel Month and... neither of them will be in Marvel Month, see you in December for Doctor Strange
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave a comment, whether you agree or disagree with my opinions, and you're perfectly welcome to. Please be considerate