Whatever
happens behind the scenes (and for the purposes of this review series, I’m
going to ignore that) there’s one thing you can’t deny. Pixar have become
pioneers in the animation industry. The dream of having computer generated
animated pictures seemed a long way away back when the foundation of Pixar was
being built, but today CG animation is everywhere, using computers to animate
is practically the norm and hand drawn is saved for only the rarest of Japanese
anime and some bits in Mary Poppins Returns.
Pixar’s
first film is Toy Story, released in 1995, this film was made with a relatively
small $30m budget. Disney handled marketing and distribution in return for
profits and design rights. And boy was that a lucrative deal for Disney as Toy
Story is an international phenomenon, making over 10 times its budget at the
box office spilling into billions of dollars of merchandise, theme park
attractions and sequels.
It’s well
acclaimed, with a rare 100% Rotten Tomatoes Rating, so what do I think?
Toy Story
follows the adventures of Woody the Cowboy (Tom Hanks) and Buzz Lightyear (Tim
Green). They’re the toys of one Andy Davis (John Morris) 6 years old and in
desperate need of some real friends, not just ones that show up to your
birthday party… I can relate
Buzz
Lightyear’s arrival shakes things up as Woody, once Andy’s favourite toy, is
instantly and immediately replaced, it doesn’t help that Buzz carries a cocky
attitude and is completely aloof to what he really is. In an attempt to hide
him, he accidentally knocks Buzz out of the window and shenanigans ensue.
The plot is
relatively simplistic but the idea of toys coming to life when adults don’t see
them allows for some great visual jokes. Although what 6-year boy keeps a
bo-peep toy? Whilst the other toys don’t get as much screen-time, many of them
do have personalities that shine through, Mr Potato Head’s anger, Bo Peep’s
love for Woody (yeah, I know), the militaristic nature of Sergent and his army,
and the general loyalty of Slinky, to name a few.
The world is
kept small, with only a few major locations, partly I suspect to keep down
costs as it means using fewer new assets, but it actually helps as this is a
fairly small scale conflict. The toys are lost and need to find their way home,
and possibly defeat the psychotic guy who lives next door by the name of Sid
(Eric Von Detten).
Sid is
fairly run of the mill as a villain. He is evil and enjoys being evil for no
particular reason. They don’t develop him as a character and I suspect that
might be the compromise of the incredibly short run-time. Again, CG animation
was fairly new, and a risk, so the budget was important. My only point about
him is he somehow is able to buy and use fireworks at the age of 10.
He doesn’t
face any kind of conflict outside of what happens around the climax. He’s less
a character and more just another obstacle, and the obstacle is directly for
the toys and not at Andy, surprisingly. Andy and Sid never interact at all in
the entire movie. That said, highlighting animosity between them could well
have proven pointless since Andy was moving house.
Andy too
suffers from lack of personality. He’s a generic excitable 6-year old and
occasional plot device. I realise he’s not the focal character but the central
conflict was about him so it would’ve been more effective if we’d known him
better.
I understand
that Woody’s character had to be rewritten to make him likeable enough that you
root for him, whilst still having the flaws central to his arc. I think they
did a fine enough job with that, Woody’s jealousy is built up for a bit and the
flaws in Buzz’s personality shine there. Buzz can be a little annoying but
because it’s built on his naivety about what he is and his place in the world,
it comes across as charming.
Over the
course of the movie, the two have to learn to work together and it’s a standard
buddy cop routine. Both characters are reasonably entertaining and have great
dialogue together. The two set-pieces that make up the climax of the movie,
that is defeating Sid and catching up with the moving van are entertaining and
well-animated.
The
animation is decent, the choice to focus on the toys benefits this because the
design has a very plastic-y texture to it that works well with toys, it works
less well with the human characters, who don’t look right, and carry the same
plastic-y texture. But it’s a great starting block and provides plenty for them
work on in the future. Boy will they take that and run with it.
I won’t be
scoring these movies, rather I’ll be ranking them, so without further ado
#1 – Toy Story
Well, where
did you expect it to be?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave a comment, whether you agree or disagree with my opinions, and you're perfectly welcome to. Please be considerate