It's still Spider-man Month!
By now, you
probably know what my opinion is of the Raimi movies, namely that they all
suck. Not to say that there weren’t some good things. Spider-man doesn’t blame
himself for everything that goes wrong in the world (like he seems to in the
comics, according to Linkara) some of the villains were decent, I actually like the Green Goblin, and
erm… erm… yeah, that’s about it for the compliments, I have very little else to
applaud.
Contrary to
popular belief, it was not the poor reception of Spider-man 3 that lead to the
reboot, well, not exactly. Raimi was working on a Spider-man 4, with Maguire
set to resume his role as Peter Parker and Spider-man, hell: they had plans to
make Spider-man’s 5 and 6 concurrently, if Spider-man 4 was enough of a
success. (Having said that, the idea of taking Felicia Hardy, a character who
has an alter-ego as the Black Cat in the comics, and turning her into a female
knock-off of the Vulture does not impress me, in fact, with rumours of the
Lizard, and the real Vulture also making an appearance, means it may well have
gone down the same route as Spider-man 3 in terms of overstuffed villains)
However,
creative problems and Raimi’s inability to get his wanted budget or time frame
lead to him leaving the franchise entirely. Sony decided to the reboot the
franchise with new director Mark Webb (yes, we all know that joke, don’t say
it)
So we have
this reboot origin story, the Amazing Spider-man. Which it’s time to look into
I’ll address
the major complaint most people have with this story to start with, the fact
that it re-treads a lot of material from the Raimi Spider-man movie. And yeah,
they’re probably right about that.
Parker losing Uncle Ben, with great power comes great responsibility and the spider-sense moments. It’s an unfortunate consequence of them doing a
reboot with a retelling of Spider-man’s origin story. It’s inevitable that
they’ll retread over some moments. There is some effort to make this a
different story from the last one and some of it comes off quite well, whilst some of
it is absolutely ridiculous.
Peter Parker
is a skateboard riding, contacts wearing (sometimes), slightly popular with the
ladies, not all that often bullied by Flash (accident in the morning, followed
by being beaten up for defending another victim) teenaged loser. I don’t like
the skateboard or the contact lenses. It kind of does dumb down his geeky
image.
OK but we
come to my biggest problem with this movie. Peter does a terrible job of hiding
his secret identity. First he causes an incident on the train (which I’m
surprised was never reported to the police to be honest, it may have been an
accident but that’s not how it’d look to an onlooker) he then breaks just
about everything in his house: windows, pipes, mirrors, alarm clocks etc. He
also somehow manages to shatter a basket-ball net and bend a football post by
throwing a football at it. Also, his mask comes off in every f*cking encounter
he has with the main villains and sometimes even the minor ones.
You ever
seen the Batman Beyond episode Unmasked? Terry McGinnis unmasked to make a kid
confident enough to take his hand, in the process he makes that kid a target.
Here, it never has any consequences.
So, Peter
walks, rather too easily, into a high security lab and gets the spider-bite as
you’d expect.
To try and
differentiate it from the Raimi Trilogy, they try a different angle with
Peter’s parents, making his father an Oscorp Scientist with Curt Connors, our
soon to be exceptionally clichéd villain for the movies. It’s actually one of
the least interesting parts of the movie; it doesn’t get much screen time
either, so I won’t complain too much.
Gwen Stacey.
I like her more than Mary Jane. Then again I like Playstation Move Heroes more
than Mary Jane (shameless plug). She’s smart, able to use her own initiative,
doesn’t cheat on anyone and more importantly, she doesn’t need to be rescued
every other scene! Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone have great chemistry
together. It actually does say something that they became a couple in real life
as well.
Lack of
Spider-man is expected in an origin story. But there’s a lot to like about
Peter Parker. They show that he’s intelligent (if still socially awkward) and
actually good-willed. He helps people, if only in small ways like standing up
for the guy Flash was bullying, and… Standing up for the other guy Flash was
bullying. It helps define Peter as a likeable character before adding Spidey to
the mix, something I feel they rather failed at with the Raimi movies.
Oh and
they’ve given him proper web-shooters. I cannot be happier about that. This way
they can malfunction without it being contrived. (And I’ve also made it clear
in my Spider-man 1 review that I thought that organic shooters is a really
stupid idea anyway)
Ah and then
we have the particularly good thing about this reboot. You know how there was
always a sense that the city was against them, but never actually physical
evidence. Here there’s actually physical evidence. The cops are hunting him
(Marvel Universe for you) lead by Captain Stacey, Gwen’s father and prominent
part of the Spider-man verse before his death. Oh and Spider-man is actually
funny in this one.
Look, I’m
not blind to the problems with this movie. The Lizard conveniently leaving his
plan for Peter to see, Peter’s camera having a massive label revealing his
identity, the retreads of another spider-man movie, the sheer number of times
Peter reveals his secret. The backwards attempts to modernise the character
(the skateboard etc), the overly dark colour scheme and the numerous others
that I’m sure have been brought up in other reviews, but truth be told, I still
prefer this to the Raimi movies.
Don’t get me
wrong, the movie still needs work and I think some of the sequel does attempt
to rectify these mistakes. It creates more problems in the process, but I’ll
get to that during my review of the Amazing Spider-man 2.
Rating
65/100
For more reviews click here
Images used in this review are from The Amazing Spider-man and belong to their respective owners. All images in this review are subject to fair use.
For more reviews click here
Images used in this review are from The Amazing Spider-man and belong to their respective owners. All images in this review are subject to fair use.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave a comment, whether you agree or disagree with my opinions, and you're perfectly welcome to. Please be considerate